.jpg "Opportunities, Appliacation, Openings"){kind=small}
.jpg "Hand Job, Blow Job, Job Search, Monster Job"){kind=small}
.jpg "pusat resume, daftar kerja, cari kerja"){kind=small}
.jpg "Project Manager, SOftware Engineer, SAP Consultant"){kind=small}
workbook lab question on trunking
Hi Jason
Try using switchport trunk nonegotiate.
Best Regards David
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jason Kline Sent: 2008-08-19 21:22 To: ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: Re: workbook lab question on trunking
I was posed with a question on a workbook mock lab and noticed that I was incorrect on my answer however achieved the desired results. The question was worded build trunks among all 4 switches (3550 and 3560) using ISL, do NOT negotiate trunk links and build ether channel links that are also NOT negotiable. For the trunk links I used static trunking with ISL as the tagging protocol. For the ether channels I used ether channel only, not PAGP or LACP. I think my answers where correct and however it seems that I am not. Please let me know what wording I should be aware of to properly configure a task in a workbook lab.
Regards,
Jason Kline
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
