Job Search, Job Listing, Opportunity
Work at home job, job vacancy
find a job, vacancy list, cari lowongan
Butuh, Segera, secretary, director

why doesn’t far end switch show near end host as CDP neighbor on incoming trunk link?


Just turn off cdp on that particular port on CAT1 connecting to BB1. “no cdp enable”
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Hobbs wrote:
> Thank you for the reply, but I am not having any configuration issues. It > is only a question. I don’t want CAT1 to see BB1 as a neighbor, I am just > trying to understand why it doesn’t. > > I am not doing dot1q tunneling > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Jonathan Greenwood II wrote: > >> You need to change the switchport mode from access to dot1q-tunnel. >> >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Hobbs wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying get my head around a semi-complex protocol tunneling task, >>> but I >>> have some questions on the basics. >>> >>> Here’s the topology >>> >>> “Near end host”: BB1 >>> “Far end switch”: CAT2 >>> >>> [BB1]f0/1—–f0/11[CAT1]f0/23—–dot1q >>> trunk—–f0/23[CAT2]f0/1—–f0/1[R1] >>> >>> To get cdp tunneling to work (and it does work) I enable this on CAT1 and >>> CAT2 access ports: >>> >>> CAT1: >>> interface f0/11 >>> switchport mode access >>> switchport access vlan 100 >>> l2protocol-tunneling cdp >>> no cdp enable >>> >>> CAT2: >>> interface f0/1 >>> switchport mode access >>> switchport access vlan 100 >>> l2protocol-tunneling cdp >>> no cdp enable >>> >>> The trunk between CAT1 and CAT2 carries vlan 100 as well as others. >>> >>> This is what I understand so far: >>> >>> BB1 sends a multicast CDP packet on it’s port to CAT1. >>> Since CAT1 has cdp tunneling enabled, it forwards it rather than >>> processes >>> it. Is this correct? >>> CAT1 sends this packet out all trunk links that have vlan 100 allowed AND >>> any access ports on VLAN100. Is this correct? >>> The packet still has the cisco CDP destination MAC. Is this correct? >>> The packet is dot1q tagged and sent out port fa0/23 and still has cisco >>> CDP >>> destination MAC address. Is this correct? >>> >>> Question: >>> >>> CAT2 doesn’t have tunneling on port fa0/23. >>> Why doesn’t CAT2 now process this CDP packet and show BB1 has a CDP >>> neighbor >>> on fa0/23? >>> Does trunking override this behavior? >>> Does CAT2 treat this packet differently because it is a tagged CDP >>> packet? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>> Subscription information may be found at: >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Bookmark this post:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
keywords found: tunneling groups cisco information ports having allowed 

Leave a Comment

Related Post