vrrp best practise / tracking
Hi Daniel, if the question doesn’t specify an address to use and there’s no tracking requirement I would go for option one. But this only my opinion
Sabrina
— Daniel Fischer wrote:
> hi group > which vrrp implementaion is most “ccie style”? > > 1. use interface ip of master router as vrrp address > -> tracking not possible > > R1–FR > | > Client-ETH| R3—> > | / > R2–FR > > R1: interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 125.1.125.1 255.255.255.0 > vrrp 1 ip 151.1.125.1 > > R2: interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 125.1.125.2 255.255.255.0 > vrrp 1 ip 125.1.125.1 > > 2. use extra address (equivalent to hsrp) and track > (if redundant uplinks)? > > R1: track 1 interface serial 0/0/0 line-protocol > > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 125.1.125.1 255.255.255.0 > vrrp 1 ip 125.1.125.3 > vrrp 1 track 1 decrement 20 > vrrp 1 priority 110 > > > R2: track 1 interface serial 0/0/0 line-protocol > > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 125.1.125.2 255.255.255.0 > vrrp 1 ip 125.1.125.3 > vrrp 1 track 1 decrement 20 > vrrp 1 priority 100 > > > Daniel > > > — > > > Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer > Onlinekosten zu sparen! > Ideal f|r Modem und ISDN: > http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer > >
























