Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

Thanks again,
Have you got a link for the Petr Lukhov article?
Kriz
________________________________________ From: Radioactive Frog [mailto:pbhatkoti@gmail.com] Sent: 28 May 2008 03:13 To: Chris Gray Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: Re: The old favourite - Service policy on FR interface vs service policy in a map-class on FR Interface vs Traffic shaping AGH
Have a look at the internetworkexpert’s blog. There is a nice article on Frame-relay posted by Petr Lukhov. That will answer your all questions. Hi Experts,
Has anyone found any clear documentation on how and when to use Service-policy style MQC With frame relay,
Frog>> this is the latest new method to create in this style, shape the traffic in regular MQC style for frame-relay. When to enable frame relay traffic shaping, when not to , when to use a map-class , when not to etc.
FROG>>> Map class is required if you are doing frame-relay traffic shapping.
Am I right in thinking we are at a cross point in technology between legacy and new i.e. legacy being frame relay traffic shaping, priority queuing, and the modern day equivalents achieved through MQC.
Not sure about others, but I am never sure how to answer a Qos & Frame Relay question. Whether to use MQC and apply to the interface or whether to use MQC and apply through a map-class. Even when I do, when should we enable ‘frame relay traffic shaping’ under the Frame interface?
Anyone provide any sanity on this topic?
Regards