.jpg "Opportunities, Appliacation, Openings"){kind=small}
.jpg "Hand Job, Blow Job, Job Search, Monster Job"){kind=small}
.jpg "pusat resume, daftar kerja, cari kerja"){kind=small}
.jpg "Project Manager, SOftware Engineer, SAP Consultant"){kind=small}
Static M-cast and Auto-rp
Auto-RP uses the election of highest RP ip address as the tie-breaker. Since Auto-RP mapping agents use the highest RP for each group or range of multicast addresses, Auto-RP provides redundant RP capability.
If you have configured static RP with override feature, static RP has the highest precedence over Auto-RP. Static RP does not have a backup, if it fails, depending on the multicast mode set on the interface, a lost of RP may resulted in Dense-mode fallback.
For smaller address to become the RP, you need to use BSR (PIM v2) with the priority command feature which is not available to Auto-RP.
HTH
On Dec 17, 2007 10:38 PM, nicky noname wrote: > Hello, > > My question is with regard to the order in which PIM routers choose there RP > assignment. > > Auto-rp is preferred over static rp, unless you use the override feature. > > But we also have the highest RP IP address wins ( which is what I think is > the preferred choice). > > Which has precedence, highest IP address or auto-rp assignment over static > assignment? > > I should lab it up and see, but I am unable to for the next few days. > > I am wondering if this provides a solution to making a smaller IP address > the preferred RP, when you are restricted to using loopbacks given. > > > Thanks and regards > nic > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
