Job Search, Job Listing, Opportunity
Work at home job, job vacancy
find a job, vacancy list, cari lowongan
Butuh, Segera, secretary, director

service policy inbound does not work………..


Apology guys….IP precedence is L3.
~Subodh
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of subodh.rawat@wipro.com Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 8:57 PM To: mpls1979@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: RE: service policy inbound does not work………..
But IP Precedence is Layer 2.
Thanks Subodh
________________________________
From: Monica Belluci [mailto:mpls1979@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 6:19 PM To: Subodh Singh Rawat (WT01 - TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDER); Cisco certification Subject: Re: service policy inbound does not work………..
Hi Subodh, I implement same scenerio with Dynamips and found same error %Error: FastEthernet1/8 Service Policy Configuration Failed.Only Police Action S upported. Even though I did not use police command in policy-map . One thing I marked if I changed port to layer 3 port by “no switchport” it accept the command.Require more investigation !
Thanks Monica

On Jan 20, 2008 2:52 PM, wrote:
Thanks Monica for reply…..I am setting up precedence value to 5. I am neither doing policing nor shaping.
Pls help.
Thanks Subodh
________________________________
From: Monica Belluci [mailto:mpls1979@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 12:09 PM To: Subodh Singh Rawat (WT01 - TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDER); Cisco certification Subject: Re: service policy inbound does not work………..
Hi Subodh ,
As per of my Knowledge Police can apply on Inbound as well as outbound Shaping can apply only on outbound . Can you re-check are you doing policing rather than shaping ?
Thanks
Nalini Roy.
On Jan 19, 2008 7:03 PM, wrote:
Hi,
Can we apply service policy as inbound on 3550 switch?
This policy map is setting the ip precedence to 5 for WEB traffic.
When I applied this on Dynamips (Switch) on inbound at one of the Fastethernet port, it said that only police is allowed inbound.
I am asking this question because same scenario is given in one of the CCIE book. However, as far as i have knowledge, we can not apply any queueuing mechanism inbound.
Thanks Subodh
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
www.wipro.com

Bookmark this post:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
keywords found: setting cisco presence virus caused rather queueuing 

Leave a Comment

Related Post