route-map permit statement in bgp
Keep in mind, with the bgp suppress-inactive command, you will still see the advertised network in the example I showed you, because it is still in the RIB table...
On 6/27/06, Skinner, Stephen wrote: > > guys, > > here is one for you. ...
This is my 1st post to the list and I'm just getting started wih my quest for the R&S CCIE. ...
Agreed Joseph - both philosophically and practically. Philosophically because you don't want to allow your high degree of familiarity with a given topology become a crutch. ...
I think your ordering is just a touch off there... (#3/4 of each)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a0080094 9e8.shtml#one
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. ...
...exist, BGP will prefer the route with ... 20 R1(config-route-map)# end R1# You may be wondering about the “route-map NET3 permit 20
...our previous lab on BGP route ... aggregate-address ... statement. R3(config ... permit 10 R3(config)# ip as-path access-list 20 permit 20
...map. It’s simmiliar to the unsupress-map in BGP. As there is different behavior for the route-map statement if ... 5 permit 150.1.2.0/24...
...the route-map to the neighbor statement: ... Rack16R2(config-route-map)#route-map OUT_TO_R4 permit 1000 Rack16R2(config-route-map)#router bgp...
...some easy BGP points because I forgot to add a “permit the rest” type of statement at the end of my route-map. I left another easy BGP...
...statement. R1 ... router bgp 1 ... route-map SUP permit 10 ... match ip address prefix-list SUP. R1#sh ip bgp BGP table version is 15, local...