no-export bgp
I'm having the same multicast problem that I did a couple labs ago. I'm not sure what's causing it. ...
Not that I against the tightening up....Because I am all for it, but isn't this also another way for the "test/lab Vendors" to make a few more bucks????
I mean really, if you want to tighten this up, you would have to perform some sort of face to face verbal before they took the lab....that would be the most sure way to know if someone knew what they were doing.
As far as test forensics....it don't take a genius to beat the system their either, count to 60, click the answer, move to the next question, count to 64, next, etc...again, if you want to really lock it down, perform a verbal assessment, that will be the only way to be as close to 100% sure as possible.
JB
-----Original Message----- From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Scott Morris Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:28 PM To: 'Michael Jones'; 'Joseph Brunner' Cc: 'Farrukh Haroon'; ronnie.angello@gmail.com; 'nortic @hackermail.com'; 'Narbik Kocharians'; 'Cisco certification' Subject: RE: Good job CISCO!!!!
I think that would be perfectly reasonable! ...
Dear all, Can you kindly tell me in which scenarios shall i use the BGP deterministic-med command? ..What is its effect? .....and any information about it! ...
Hi Igor, I believe, as far as route-redistribution from OSPF to RIP goes, I used the identical configuration.
As I said, I can reproduce similar problems (in some sceanario, more specifically if we remote the redistribution route-map and put it back in). ...