.jpg "Opportunities, Appliacation, Openings"){kind=small}
.jpg "Hand Job, Blow Job, Job Search, Monster Job"){kind=small}
.jpg "pusat resume, daftar kerja, cari kerja"){kind=small}
.jpg "Project Manager, SOftware Engineer, SAP Consultant"){kind=small}
RPF failures on multicast over gre tunnel
I tried using loopback for tunnel ip source, and multicast works properly after that. I guess I’d just clear things up with proctor if something like this comes up.
Thanks everyone for your replies.
-Rahul
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Sadiq Yakasai wrote:
> Hi Rich, > > You only have a recursion risk when you have a dynamic routing > protocol advertising the other end of the tunnel and as such, you get > into a situation when the tunnel is advertised via the physical and > the physical is advertised via the tunnel as well, and it gets all > complicated. > > But in this situation, the ends of the tunnel are almost directly > connected. I said almost because there is a FR switch between. But > from the IP layer’s perspective, they are. > > HTH > > Sadiq >
– Bugs can neither be created nor be removed from software by a developer. They can only be converted from one form to another. The total number of bugs in the software always remain constant.
..}l}..}l}.
