Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

very cool paper here that could help you: http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/2008/CMU-CS-08-123.pdf
-Luan
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Jack Tsai wrote:
> Jack Tsai wrote: > >> topology: R3–R1–R4 >> >> — Background — >> R3 loopback0: 172.16.56.3/32 >> All three routers are running EIGRP no auto-summary. >> R3 Lo0 is not introduced to the EIGRP by network; it is injected by >> Redistribute Connected >> sh ip route on R4 shows that 172.16.56.3/32 is EX with distance 170. >> All interfaces of the three routers are reachable by all routers. >> >> — New add-in and observation — >> add router RIP version 2 on R3 and R1 with no auto-summary >> R3 Lo0 is not introduced to the RIP by network; it is injected by >> Redistribute Connected metric 1 >> sh ip route on R1 shows R 172.16.56.3 [120/1] via 192.168.13.3 >> sh ip route on R4 DOES NOT show this route on its routing table! >> sh ip eigrp top on R4 DOES NOT show this route (172.16.56.3) on its EIGRP >> topology table!! >> >> — Remedy — >> add the command distance 180 172.16.56.3 0.0.0.0 on R4 router RIP will >> solve the problem. >> >> –Question — >> (1) Is there a way we can do on R1 to change the distance of the learned >> route (172.16.56.3/32)? >> (2) Why 172.16.56.3/32 is not on the R4 EIGRP topology table while it is >> on the R1 EIGRP table? >> (3) Any comments? >> >> Thanks, >> Jack Tsai >> CCIE R&S candidate >> > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html