.jpg "Opportunities, Appliacation, Openings"){kind=small}
.jpg "Hand Job, Blow Job, Job Search, Monster Job"){kind=small}
.jpg "pusat resume, daftar kerja, cari kerja"){kind=small}
.jpg "Project Manager, SOftware Engineer, SAP Consultant"){kind=small}
redistribution
If I remember the lab correctly (it’s been a while) there were also 2 points of mutual redistribution between EIGRP and OSPF on the other side of the network. I had the same question as you, but I reconciled it by believing that some of the RIP routes could be advertised into OSPF, redistributed into EIGRP, then make the loop and come back to the RIP router via OSPF. And obviously an OSPF route would be preferred to a RIP route due to a lower AD.
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 12:22 PM To: ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: redistribution
I seem to have started to get a handle on route redistribution. Theres one thing I keep seeing that I can’t make sense of. is a router redistributing ospf and ripv2. On a couple of occasions I’ve seen ospf redistributed into rip with a distance of 109. This means that rip routes will have a lower AD thasn the OSPF routes. Therip network is a stub. what am I missing. I kind of get tags, route-maps and the the AD on external routes, bhut I don’t get this.
