.jpg "Opportunities, Appliacation, Openings"){kind=small}
.jpg "Hand Job, Blow Job, Job Search, Monster Job"){kind=small}
.jpg "pusat resume, daftar kerja, cari kerja"){kind=small}
.jpg "Project Manager, SOftware Engineer, SAP Consultant"){kind=small}
port-channel load-balance
I think you may need to configure it as port-channel dst-mac on the SW1 port-channel interface.
Jorge
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of dailongli@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 3:16 AM To: ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: port-channel load-balance
Hi.all: I have a question about port-channel load-balance. This is my topology. server–SW1======SW2. (sw1 is 3550,sw2 is 3560) sw1 and sw2 are connected in trunk ,with portchannel 100. There is a server connected to SW1,and divided into vlan 50. There are many clients on SW2 in vlan 50 ,want to access the server.
So I configure port-channel load-balance dst-mac on SW1. My question is that,Should I configure port-channel load-balance src-dst-mac or leave it default (src-mac)? Is it better that load-balance based on src-dst-mac than src-mac?
thanks in advance.
Dailong
???
