Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

My bad. I misread your email.
You an redistribute the loopback on R1. Then use a distribute-list out.
int lo0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
access-list 1 deny 1.1.1.0 access-list per any
route-map REDIST_LO0 per 10 match inter lo0
router ospf 1 redistribute connected subnets route-map REDIST_LO0 distribute-list 1 out
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Piotr wrote:
> Try this > > On R2 > > ip prefix-list FILTERLSA3 seq 5 deny 111.111.111.0/24 > ip prefix-list FILTERLSA3 seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 > router ospf 1 > area 1 range filter-list FILTERLSA3 in > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Sergei Udovenko wrote: > >> Hello to all CCIE candidates! >> I’ve the following topology: >> >> lo:1.1.1.x->R1—R2—-R3 >> >> R1 - area 1 >> R2 - ABR >> R3 - area 0 >> >> The issue that I want that 1.1.1.x will not be advertised to the R2(ABR) >> and >> all other routers int area 0. So the problem here is that I want to find >> workaround to filter route in intra- area and not on ABR with area 1 range >> 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 not-advertise command. Also because there are about >> 20 >> routers in area 0 that shouldn’t receive 1.1.1.x and I don’t want to >> use distribute-list >> x in on each router in area 0 to filter the local routing table on each >> router. >> >> >> May be some of you have any suggestion how to get this workaround? >> >> ——————– >> Best regards, >> Sergei >> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net