Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

As Scott said - they have to have same database. You can however not have route in the routing table using distribute-list. I.E. it will be in the database on R2, but it won’t appear in the routing table there. With Distribute-list and area range you will not have route on R2 or anywhere else in the network. Note: Dristribute list has local significance in OSPF and alters only local operations (RIB composition - Routing - Redistribution)
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Sergei Udovenko wrote:
> Hello to all CCIE candidates! > I’ve the following topology: > > lo:1.1.1.x->R1—R2—-R3 > > R1 - area 1 > R2 - ABR > R3 - area 0 > > The issue that I want that 1.1.1.x will not be advertised to the R2(ABR) > and > all other routers int area 0. So the problem here is that I want to find > workaround to filter route in intra- area and not on ABR with area 1 range > 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 not-advertise command. Also because there are about > 20 > routers in area 0 that shouldn’t receive 1.1.1.x and I don’t want to > use distribute-list > x in on each router in area 0 to filter the local routing table on each > router. > > > May be some of you have any suggestion how to get this workaround? > > ——————– > Best regards, > Sergei > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > > >
— Pavel Bykov —————- Don’t forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net