Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

The requirement is to exlude 225, 224 and 239.
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:46:51 +0300From: ananth.sarma@gmail.comTo: thekonqueror@gmail.comSubject: Re: Multicast GroupingCC: mike.haddad@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com Mike / Rahul,
I think the requirement is to exclude only 227.0.0.1 and 237.0.0.1.
I may be wrong. Let me know.
Regards,
Ananth On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:01 AM, theKonqueror wrote: Grouping the access lists as 226.0.0.0 12.255.255.255 will also allowfollowing groups:227.0.0.1229.0.0.1231.0.0.1233.0.0.1234.0.0.1235.0.0.1237.0.0.1If the task says, configure rp for ONLY given groups, then the 1 line aclcannot be used. I’d ask proctor for clarification on this.Thanks,RahulOn Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Mike Haddad wrote:
> Hello,>> I still don’t understand why the below ACL can’t be grouped:> interface Loopback0> ip pim sparse-dense-mode> !> ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 16 group-list 50> !> access-list 50 permit 226.0.0.0 1.255.255.255> access-list 50 permit 228.0.0.0 3.255.255.255> access-list 50 permit 232.0.0.0 3.255.255.255> access-list 50 permit 236.0.0.0 1.255.255.255> access-list 50 permit 238.0.0.0 0.255.255.255>>> Why can’t we group them as:> access-list 50 permit 226.0.0.0 12.255.255.255>> Thanks for the clarification,>> _________________________________________________________________> Enter the Hunt & you could win a 2008 Eclipse Spyder! Click here to enter!> http://g.msn.ca/ca55/213>>