IEWB Vol 2 lab 13 task 3.7, OSPF distance command

August 29, 2008 @ 3:09 pm · Filed under CCIE Study

Hi Marc and Lloyd,
I can see changed the prefixes 139.1.11.0, 139.1.6.0 and 139.1.7.0, but not 139.1.2.0. Seems to be a bug O_O.
Thank you both for your help .
—– Original Message —– From: “Lloyd Ardoin” To: “Julio Carrasco” ; Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:49 PM Subject: RE: IEWB Vol 2 lab 13 task 3.7, OSPF distance command
> Hi Julio, > > that is interesting that you had similar results that I had. I actually > had > one of the prefixes I believe the .11 that the distance changed on but > ther > rest did not. I tried it serveral times but could never get the distances > to > change so I gave up and used summarization to meet the objective. If you > find > the answer I would be interested in that also. > > thanks, > > Lloyd V Ardoin > > > > > From: Julio Carrasco > Sent: Fri 8/29/2008 12:16 PM > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: IEWB Vol 2 lab 13 task 3.7, OSPF distance command > > > Hello, > > I have issued the next commands: > router ospf 1 > distance 109 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 1 > ! > access-list 1 permit 139.1.2.0 > access-list 1 permit 139.1.6.0 > access-list 1 permit 139.1.7.0 > access-list 1 permit 139.1.11.0 > > But I still seeing the routes that configured on the > access-list with distance 110. I hcecked the IEWB solution, and they did > the > same but with an standard named ACL. > > Could any one help me to figure out why isn4t working the distance > command. > > Best regards, > Julio Carrasco. > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net