Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

If they are already there when you sit down in front of the computer to do the lab, the ordered set you just described may not help you.
If you get them, configure your frame appropriately and reboot. That is the best bet.
On 8/31/06, Scott Smith wrote: > > Yes. As soon I have a chance I’m going to try 12.3 (12.2T on the > routers now). Actually, I dont recall having this issue before I > updated to 12.2(15)T17. > > For a sanity check I should not have a in-arp issue with the following, > correct? > > 1) shut > 2) encap frame > 3) no frame inv > 4) other config (ip, maps, etc) > 5) no shut (all frame routers on a subnet, together) > > -Scott > > > On 8/31/06, Brian Dennis wrote: > > Did you try to reboot the routers? > > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security) > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com > > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc. > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada) > > > > > > —–Original Message—– > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > Scott Smith > > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 1:00 PM > > To: Victor Cappuccio > > Cc: groupstudy > > Subject: Re: Frame Question > > > > Inverse arp is disabled on all of the routers attached to the frame > cloud. I can blow away the config by changing the encap to HDLC, shut the > interfaces, carefuly reconfigure, and those “0.0.0.0″ entries reappear. > > > > By carefuly I mean: 1) shut, 2) encap frame, 3) no frame inv, 4) > remaining config, 5) no shut. > > > > I cannot make them disappear! I can “move” them to a sub-int but nothing > I’ve tried makes them go away. Config, reconfig, reload, nothing. > > > > How do they appear when all of the routers that are using frame have > inverse arp disabled? I’m staring to wonder if this is another undocumented > feature > > > > -Scott > > > > > > On 8/31/06, Victor Cappuccio wrote: > > > Check out, the routers 2,3,4,5 they sure have frame-relay inverse-arp > > > enabled, if those routers are the end of DLCIs, 113, 105, 104, 103 > > > > > > This is because the Frame-relay Inverse-ARP / Inverse-ARP Reply could > > > not be completed > > > > > > —–Mensaje original—– > > > De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de > > > Scott Smith Enviado el: Jueves, 31 de Agosto de 2006 02:56 p.m. > > > Para: groupstudy > > > Asunto: Frame Question > > > > > > What causes this “ip 0.0.0.0 dlci ” to occur? > > > > > > R1: > > > > > > interface Serial0/0 > > > ip address 167.1.135.1 255.255.255.0 > > > encapsulation frame-relay > > > frame-relay map ip 167.1.135.3 103 broadcast frame-relay map ip > > > 167.1.135.5 103 no frame-relay inverse-arp end > > > > > > Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 113(0×71,0×1C10) > > > broadcast, > > > CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 > > > dlci 105(0×69,0×1890) > > > broadcast, > > > CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 > > > dlci 104(0×68,0×1880) > > > broadcast, > > > CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 > > > dlci 102(0×66,0×1860) > > > broadcast, > > > CISCO, status defined, inactive Serial0/0 (up): ip > > > 167.1.135.3 dlci 103(0×67,0×1870), static, > > > broadcast, > > > CISCO, status defined, active Serial0/0 (up): ip > > > 167.1.135.5 dlci 103(0×67,0×1870), static, > > > CISCO, status defined, active > > > > > > > > > -Scott > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > _ Subscription information may be found at: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html