<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert</title>
	<link>http://www.infoccie.com</link>
	<description>Not Yet a CCIE? .. Where 've You Been ? !!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:09:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>use of CS in qos?</title>
		<description>thanks for your answer.
but i was wondering does  a device (understading only IPP) gets a DSCP marking isnt it going to ignore the last 3 bits anyway? if yes what the point of the CS?
Abderrahim
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:12:33 -0400 Subject: Re: use of CS in qos? From: ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/use-of-cs-in-qos-3/use-of-cs-in-qos-3.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>use of CS in qos?</title>
		<description>Hey,
IPP uses the most significant 3 bits in the ToS field in the IP header.  With DSCP the CS values essentially do the same thing.  In order to be backwards compatible with IPP it only uses the 3 most significant bits. Maybe this will help you visualize:
CSx  ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/use-of-cs-in-qos-2/use-of-cs-in-qos-2.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Live Stream from Cisco Live / Networkers</title>
		<description>I think ours were better looking. I'll have to find a couple pics of each and post them on a voting webpage.
thanks, Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&#38;S / Security) CCSI# 30482 CEO / President CCBOOTCAMP - Cisco Learning Partner (CLP) Email: brad@ccbootcamp.com Toll Free: 877-654-2243 International: +1-702-968-5100 Skype: skype:ccbootcamp?call FAX: +1-702-446-8012 ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/live-stream-from-cisco-live-networkers-12/live-stream-from-cisco-live-networkers-12.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>John Chambers</title>
		<description>LOL @ the JNCIE logo that is classic.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Rick Mur  wrote:
&#62; Please share this funny thing for the people who didn't attend ;-) &#62; I really like this pic, especially the JNCIE logo on your arm ;-) &#62; &#62; http://www.flickr.com/photos/25679159@N03/3675792133/in/photostream/ &#62; &#62; ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/john-chambers-4/john-chambers-4.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>John Chambers</title>
		<description>Please share this funny thing for the people who didn't attend ;-) I really like this pic, especially the JNCIE logo on your arm ;-)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/25679159@N03/3675792133/in/photostream/
Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (R&#38;S / SP) rick@rickmur.com


On 3 jul 2009, at 19:55, Scott Morris wrote:
&#62; Except that wasn't Marvin next to us.   That ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/john-chambers-3/john-chambers-3.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>use of CS in qos?</title>
		<description>Hi all.
I understand that CS is used for backward compatibility with IP precedence.
My question is : if a device only understands the IP precedence and it receives a packet with the dscp marking isnt it going to ignore the last 3 bits anyway?
Thanks, Abderrahim
_________________________________________________________________ Invite your mail contacts to join ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/use-of-cs-in-qos/use-of-cs-in-qos.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Narbik Bootcamps</title>
		<description>loooooooool
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Narbik Kocharians  wrote:
&#62; I will be attending it as well. &#62; &#62; On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Dennis Worth  &#62; wrote: &#62; &#62; &#62; I will be there in Glendale. &#62; &#62; &#62; &#62; On Fri, Jul ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/narbik-bootcamps-37/narbik-bootcamps-37.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>strategy / approach question</title>
		<description>Test
-original message- Subject: RE: strategy / approach question From: "Scott M Vermillion"  Date: 21/10/2008 1:10 am
Hey Charles,
No doubt the professional instructors will have some advice for you on this topic.  But just a quick question for you:
What is your own estimate of how much time this costs you ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/strategy-approach-question-13/strategy-approach-question-13.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>as-override vs. allowas-in</title>
		<description>Well, with the allowas-in command, there's a # to say how many times it  can appear before considered looped.  With replacing the AS it would  just look like someone prepended, so unless you have a rule/aversion to  prepending it wouldn't matter.
 
 *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&#38;S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/as-override-vs-allowas-in-3/as-override-vs-allowas-in-3.htm</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>John Chambers</title>
		<description>Except that wasn't Marvin next to us.   That was some dude from the  University of Maryland!  :)  But yes, it was thoroughly amusing!
 
 *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&#38;S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
evil@ine.com
 Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
 Knowledge is ...</description>
		<link>http://www.infoccie.com/john-chambers-2/john-chambers-2.htm</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
