Job Search, Job Listing, Opportunity
Work at home job, job vacancy
find a job, vacancy list, cari lowongan
Butuh, Segera, secretary, director

BGP Unable to form Neighbor - Hold time expired


can you post sh frame-relay map for R4 ,R5 ands traceroute from R4 to R5 .
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Mahesh Shivaswamy wrote:
> R3 is having the right PVC established to R5 & the mapping are right too. > Why would R3 reach R5 via R4 ?? > > R3#sh frame-relay pvc 305 > > PVC Statistics for interface Serial1/0 (Frame Relay DTE) > > DLCI = 305, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial1/0 > > input pkts 1410 output pkts 639 in bytes 157434 > out bytes 58184 dropped pkts 0 in pkts dropped > 0 > out pkts dropped 0 out bytes dropped 0 > in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 > > out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 > out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 > 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec > pvc create time 04:31:31, last time pvc status changed 04:31:31 > > R3#sh frame-relay map > Serial1/0 (up): ip 154.1.0.4 dlci 304(0×130,0×4C00), static, > IETF, status defined, active > Serial1/0 (up): ip 154.1.0.5 dlci 305(0×131,0×4C10), static, > IETF, status defined, active > > rgds > Mahesh > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Mahesh Shivaswamy maheshs.cisco@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Kavitha, >> >> I am wondering why is 154.1.0.5 reaching through R4, R3 has a direct >> mapping statement to R5. >> >> R3#sh run int s1/0 >> Building configuration… >> >> Current configuration : 270 bytes >> ! >> interface Serial1/0 >> ip address 154.1.0.3 255.255.255.0 >> encapsulation frame-relay IETF >> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint non-broadcast >> frame-relay map ip 154.1.0.4 304 >> frame-relay map ip 154.1.0.5 305 >> no frame-relay inverse-arp >> frame-relay lmi-type cisco >> end >> >> rgds >> Mahesh >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Kavitha N (nkavitha) > > wrote: >> >>> Hi Mahesh >>> >>> I checked ur setup and noticed that trace from R3 to R5 is two hops >>> away.. >>> >>> Hence , the bgp is not working.. So we need to add ebgp multihop and its >>> working fine now.. >>> >>> R3#traceroute 154.1.0.5 >>> >>> Type escape sequence to abort. >>> Tracing the route to 154.1.0.5 >>> >>> 1 154.1.0.4 12 msec 16 msec 12 msec >>> 2 154.1.45.5 16 msec * 12 msec >>> R3# >>> >>> >>> R3# >>> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> State/PfxRcd >>> 154.1.0.4 4 400 317 331 16 0 0 00:41:45 >>> 0 >>> 154.1.0.5 4 400 133 278 16 0 0 00:41:45 >>> 0 >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Kavitha >>> —–Original Message—– >>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >>> Mahesh Shivaswamy >>> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:01 AM >>> To: Shahid Ansari >>> Cc: Hobbs; ccielab@groupstudy.com >>> Subject: Re: BGP Unable to form Neighbor - Hold time expired >>> >>> its not an L2 issue, >>> >>> R3#pi 154.1.0.5 >>> >>> Type escape sequence to abort. >>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 154.1.0.5, timeout is 2 seconds: >>> !!!!! >>> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/30/32 ms >>> R3#pi Protocol [ip]: >>> Target IP address: 154.1.0.5 >>> Repeat count [5]: 500 >>> Datagram size [100]: >>> Timeout in seconds [2]: >>> Extended commands [n]: >>> Sweep range of sizes [n]: >>> Type escape sequence to abort. >>> Sending 500, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 154.1.0.5, timeout is 2 seconds: >>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>> !!!!!!!!!! >>> Success rate is 100 percent (500/500), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/29/36 >>> ms R3#debu ip bgp BGP debugging is on for address family: IPv4 Unicast >>> R3#cle R3#clear ip bgp 154.1.0.5 R3# *May 4 12:02:29.791: BGPNSF state: >>> 154.1.0.5 went from nsf_not_active to nsf_not_active *May 4 >>> 12:02:29.791: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from OpenConfirm to Idle *May 4 >>> 12:02:29.791: BGP: 154.1.0.5 closing *May 4 12:02:29.791: BGP: >>> 154.1.0.5 went from Idle to Active *May 4 12:02:29.791: BGP: 154.1.0.5 >>> open active delayed 33844ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) >>> >>> R3# >>> *May 4 12:04:04.067: BGP: 154.1.0.5 open active, local address >>> 154.1.0.3 R3# *May 4 12:04:34.067: BGP: 154.1.0.5 open failed: >>> Connection timed out; remote host not responding, open active delayed >>> 27215ms (35000ms max, 28% >>> jitter) >>> R3# >>> *May 4 12:04:50.039: BGP: 154.1.0.5 passive open to 154.1.0.3 *May 4 >>> 12:04:50.039: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from Active to Idle *May 4 >>> 12:04:50.039: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from Idle to Connect *May 4 >>> 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcv message type 1, length (excl. >>> header) 26 >>> *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcv OPEN, version 4, holdtime 180 >>> seconds *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from Connect to >>> OpenSent *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 sending OPEN, version 4, >>> my as: 300, holdtime 180 seconds *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 >>> rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 16 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: >>> 154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 >>> (Capability) len 6 >>> *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 1, length >>> 4 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has MP_EXT CAP for afi/safi: >>> 1/1 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter >>> type 2 >>> (Capability) len 2 >>> *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has CAPABILITY cod >>> R3#e: 128, length 0 >>> *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH >>> capability(old) for all address-families *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: >>> 154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 >>> (Capability) len 2 >>> *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 2, length >>> 0 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH >>> capability(new) for all address-families >>> BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ remote AS 400 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: >>> 154.1.0.5 went from OpenSent to OpenConfirm *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: >>> 154.1.0.5 send message type 1, length (incl. >>> header) 45 >>> >>> rgds >>> Mahesh >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Shahid Ansari >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Mahesh , >>> > >>> > I think there is problem in basic ip connectivity might be due to bad >>> > cable on R5. >>> > can you check sh interface on R5 .Check layer two encapsulation >>> > completion . >>> > >>> > post us debug ip bgp if L2 is Up . >>> > >>> > — >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Shahid Ansari >>> > Saudi Arabia(Riyadh) >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Mahesh Shivaswamy >> > maheshs.cisco@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> These are real labs, I get the following error after debugging >>> >> keepalives >>> >> >>> >> R3# >>> >> *May 4 09:42:59.072: BGP: 154.1.13.1 sending KEEPALIVE (io) R3# *May >>> >>> >> 4 09:43:02.332: BGP: 154.1.38.8 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. >>> >> header) 0 >>> >> *May 4 09:43:03.072: BGP: 154.1.38.8 sending KEEPALIVE (io) R3# *May >>> >>> >> 4 09:43:22.072: BGP: 154.1.0.4 sending KEEPALIVE (io) *May 4 >>> >> 09:43:22.092: BGP: 154.1.0.4 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. >>> >> header) 0 >>> >> R3# >>> >> *May 4 09:43:57.948: BGP: 154.1.23.2 sending KEEPALIVE (io) *May 4 >>> >> 09:43:57.948: BGP: 154.1.13.1 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. >>> >> header) 0 >>> >> *May 4 09:43:57.960: BGP: 154.1.23.2 received KEEPALIVE, length >>> (excl. >>> >> header) 0 >>> >> R3# >>> >> *May 4 09:43:59.072: BGP: 154.1.13.1 sending KEEPALIVE (io) R3# *May >>> >>> >> 4 09:44:02.344: BGP: 154.1.38.8 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. >>> >> header) 0 >>> >> *May 4 09:44:03.072: BGP: 154.1.38.8 sending KEEPALIVE (io) R3# *May >>> >>> >> 4 09:44:22.072: BGP: 154.1.0.4 sending KEEPALIVE (io) *May 4 >>> >> 09:44:22.092: BGP: 154.1.0.4 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. >>> >> header) 0 >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Hobbs >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Is this dynamips or real lab? I get this in dynamips sometimes a >>> >> > few >>> >> hours >>> >> > into a big lab. also try this : >>> >> > >>> >> > debug ip bgp keepalive >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Mahesh Shivaswamy >> >> > maheshs.cisco@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Hi, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I have a FR P-M interface on R3 connecting to R4 & R5, R3 >>> >> >> establishes >>> >> BGP >>> >> >> connection to R4 but R3 -> R5 is getting hold time expired >>> >> >> message, no luck with google, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> R3#sh run | in nei >>> >> >> neighbor 154.1.0.4 remote-as 400 >>> >> >> neighbor 154.1.0.5 remote-as 400 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> R3#sh ip bgp s | be Neighbor >>> >> >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> >> >> State/PfxRcd >>> >> >> 154.1.0.4 4 400 155 169 16 0 0 >>> 00:34:19 >>> >> >> 0 >>> >> >> 154.1.0.5 4 400 54 134 0 0 0 >>> 00:30:33 >>> >> >> OpenConfirm >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> R4#sh run | in nei >>> >> >> neighbor 154.1.0.3 remote-as 300 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> R4#sh ip bgp s | be Neighbor >>> >> >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> >> >> State/PfxRcd >>> >> >> 154.1.0.3 4 300 51 46 16 0 0 >>> 00:42:51 >>> >> >> 15 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> R5#sh run | in nei >>> >> >> bgp log-neighbor-changes >>> >> >> neighbor 154.1.0.3 remote-as 300 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> R5#sh ip bgp s | be Neighbor >>> >> >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down >>> >> >> State/PfxRcd >>> >> >> 154.1.0.3 4 300 16 92 0 0 0 >>> 00:29:52 >>> >> >> OpenSent >>> >> >> >>> >> >> R3#%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 154.1.0.5 4/0 (hold time >>> >> >> expired) 0 >>> >> >> bytes >>> >> >> >>> >> >> any info will be helpful… >>> >> >> >>> >> >> rgds >>> >> >> Mahesh >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> >> >> >>> >> >> __________________________________________________________________ >>> >> >> _____ Subscription information may be found at: >>> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> >> >>> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >>> >> __ Subscription information may be found at: >>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>> >>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>> Subscription information may be found at: >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
— Regards,
Shahid Ansari Saudi Arabia(Riyadh)
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Bookmark this post:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
keywords found: shivaswamy establishes connecting error network statistics october 

Leave a Comment

Related Post