Go CCIE Go!! - A Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert

I have a stupid question:
What is the difference between “maximum-paths” and “maximumn-paths ibgp”?
I know the first one is protocol independent, other than that, are they equivalent?
Thanks
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ivan Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 7:42 AM To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; 2nd CCIE Subject: Re: BGP maximum paths
This command was integrated in IOS 12.2(28)SB
check thik link: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124tcr/t irp_r/rtebght2.htm#wp1111400
On Saturday 02 September 2006 17:46, 2nd CCIE wrote: > Hi Folks ; > I know this has been for discussion recently ..but im not able to reach > the solution from the archive ..so here we go ——–R2 ——-| > R1——| R4 > ———–R3——| > > R1,R2,R3 are on same AS 10 , R4 on AS 20 > > R4 advertises the lo1 netw (10.1.1.1/24) to both R2 and R3 via ebgp > > R2 and R3 send the network to R1 via ibgp > > what i want to achieve is that R1 load balance the traffic to R4 across > both R2 and R3 > > > I can see the network 10.1.1.1 on the bgp table twice , however on the > routing table is shows only from R2 . > > I am using maximum paths 2 on R1 , but i do not have maximum-paths ibgp > at all under the bgp process (version 12.2(27)) > > > any ideas ? > > > > > > ——————————— > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call > rates. > >