Archive for January, 2009
January 31, 2009 @ 11:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
What errors do you get in R6 ?
deb mpls traffic-eng path lookup deb mpls traffic-eng path spf deb mpls traffic-eng path verify
I remember a problem if using “ip ospf network non-broadcast” but this is not the case.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S) amsoares@netcabo.pt
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Dishan Gamage Sent: sabado, 31 […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 11:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
For the written, your RS background and the online resources are more than enough:
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/sp/online_resources.html
For the lab, i hope you are a Dynamips fan because i have these scenarios for you:
http://pwp.netcabo.pt/amsoares/dynamips/dynamips.htm
Add some books, the DocCD and workbooks and you should be good to go.
And of course, welcome to the club
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S) […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi Shawn,
“Encapsulation replicate” would be put on the eventual destination command on SW1. In this case, the issue is happening before that step. I have wiped out and cleaned the config up a couple times starting with creating the vlan first. Still had no luck. I did read about RSPAN not being able to support […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Ahhhh… The fun stuff. Always good to cause some consternation.
RFC 3630 - OSPF extensions for TE actually makes a few references to BGP as well, namely having to do with the BGP Router ID being set as the next-hop address (peer-id) for correlation purposes.
So it looks like this is built into […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
These are just miscellanous sample trivia questions from the written exam blueprint - which tends to cover things not in the lab. They also look out of date (ISDN being the giveaway).
If you studied for the lab exam by actually doing varied practice labs and reading textbooks you have nothing to fear from the […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hey Jeffrey,
Most of the extra topics you mentioned (besides PPPoE) are only in the written rather than the lab. As such I’d recommend focussing your textbook reading on MPLS and BGP (the books you mentioned are good, if they are the same Cisco Press books I used). Also read Internet Routing Architectures (if you haven’t […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Well since I got rack session going on:
R6(config)#router bgp 256 R6(config-router)#bgp router-id 0.0.0.1 %Invalid router-id 0.0.0.1 R6(config-router)#bgp router-id 255.255.255.255 %Invalid router-id 255.255.255.255 R6(config-router)#bgp router-id 224.0.0.1 %Invalid router-id 224.0.0.1 R6(config-router)#bgp router-id 223.255.255.255 R6(config-router)#
R6#sho ver | inc bin System image file is “flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-3a.bin”
}//{ | | (.)(.) | C |) (___/| […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi Jason,
those sample questions are for the Written exam.. The new questions in the lab the will not be multiple choice, They will be presented in an open-ended format with a text box to type your answer in.
Cheers. josh
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jason Madsen wrote:
> …you guys seen these? […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 10:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Those are sample written questions. They have been there for ages. From what’s been posted everywhere, the new questions are open ended. It’s amazing how many details you can forget if you just lab and don’t refresh the book knowledge every now and then. Most of the Cisco Press books have open ended review questions […]
Permalink
January 31, 2009 @ 9:09 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
The router-id in both is simply a 32-bit number.
Your call.
Scott
—- Message from “ciscozest” at 2009-02-01 08:11:46 —— > > >So in case of OSPF and BGP exist on the same router, does the router ID must be pingable or just a valid IPv4 address? >Thanks. > > > >From: Narbik Kocharians [mailto:narbikk@gmail.com] >Sent: […]
Permalink
·
« Previous entries